Step 1: Process for Re-Prioritization
When organizational, market or competitive factors change, project priorities may need to be re-assessed.
Info-Tech Tip: Don’t be afraid to cancel a project that isn’t performing or delivering its expected results. Rather than throwing more money at the problem, cancel the project before wasting even more resources on it. Consider using the remaining resources to fund a new, and perhaps more important, project instead.
|
|
1.1 Maintain Prioritization List
Business conditions change: for example, a competitor’s move may demand an immediate response; market expansion may encounter unexpected difficulties; or changing economic conditions may alter resource availability. Regardless of the reason, situational changes occur that can affect the organization’s priorities. As such, it is good practice to revisit and refresh the project priority list from time to time.
|
|
- When Budgets Abate, Reassess Project Priorities
- How to Identify A Failing Project
- Project Prioritization: IT Shouldn't Shoulder the Load
|
Step 2: Revisit Project Prioritization List and Make Adjustments
Once triggers have been identified, the organization needs to set the course for evaluating the impact and changes to the project priority list. Projects will be re-assessed and, in some cases, incur status modifications due to changing realities and circumstances.
Info-Tech Tip: Due to the time-sensitive nature of the re-prioritization process, this program runs like a compressed version of the full project prioritization program, from start to finish (e.g. Program 1 through 3). Information within the tool should be kept current and accurate, allowing this tool to be used on a continual basis. Consider running iterative sensitivity analyses to view the different potential outcomes of re-adjusting data.
|
|
2.1 Re-Rank Projects
Following events that trigger organizational change, re-evaluate the project list to identify any new project portfolio gaps. Gaps can be caused by changes in priority, goals, objectives, resources, or time urgency. This tool revisits the project prioritization short-list to reassess the ranking criteria and resource availability in line with the identified changes. Once the gaps have been analyzed, the projects are re-evaluated and re-prioritized.
|
|
- When Budgets Abate, Reassess Project Priorities
|
Step 3: Review Adjustments with Stakeholders
At this stage the project prioritization team must communicate project rankings with project stakeholders and obtain support and approval for moving forward.
Info-Tech Tip: Be prepared for questions regarding this latest request for project priority approval. Management and stakeholders will have already signed-off on the final project priority list in Program 3, so clearly state the business drivers that caused a re-adjustment process. Whether it was a lack of resource capacity or changing organizational strategies, ensure that the events that caused changes to the project priority list are included in the request for approval.
|
|
3.1 Review Proposed Adjustments with Stakeholders
Following the re-adjustment process, senior management approval must be obtained to proceed with project implementation.
|
|
|