Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions
Oracle’s Q4 FY19 Earnings May Shed Light on Cloud Strategy
Oracle just reported slightly better than expected Q4 FY19 results with revenues of $11.1B for the quarter and $39.5B for the year, up 3% in constant currency. A closer look at Oracle's change in the reporting of cloud revenues offers some clues about its longer-term cloud transition strategy.
Oracle’s Overall Revenue Breakdown
So how did the "Red Stack" do this quarter? Oracle finished relatively strong overall with a 4% increase in YoY Q4 revenues compared to FY18. Compared to its competition's lightning growth rates (e.g. Microsoft – 13% and Salesforce – 26%), this growth may seem tepid at first glance. However, readers should keep in mind that Oracle has an enormous boat to alter the direction to move the needle on its massive customer base of over 430,000 organizations.
I am regularly hard on Oracle as there is no denying it was more than a little late to the cloud game. And it's no understatement to point out the massive lead that the Big 3 have and will maintain in the IaaS space. But the cloud is much bigger than merely IaaS and Oracle does have plenty to offer in other maturing areas such as PaaS and SaaS.
Summary quarter results by product segment are noted below:
- Cloud Services and License Support: $6.8B – up 3%
- Cloud License and On-Premises License: $2.5B – up 15%
- Combined revenues for Cloud Services/License Support and Cloud License/On-Premises License were $9.3B, up 6% YoY. The remainder of revenues were in the Hardware and Services segments, both slightly down from FY18.
Highlights and Observations
The bright spots in Oracle's revenue growth center on its high-flying cloud application services, including Oracle Fusion ERP, HCM, and NetSuite. For the fiscal year 2019, these cloud application suites showed a stellar 32% growth rate, which Oracle elevates and attempts to show a healthy cloud business.
Our clients adopting Oracle cloud solutions are overwhelmingly doing so in the cloud applications space, further supporting these substantial growth numbers. However, rare is the deal we are asked to review for Oracle’s public cloud IaaS offering. When these transactions do emerge, it is generally under the guise of a lift-and-shift strategy and Oracle has highly discounted the service for the initial term to spur adoption.
It is apparent that Oracle is de-emphasizing sales of its commodity hardware offerings at the same time it is aggressively pushing higher-margin cloud business. The net results of this strategy finally seem to be paying off as Oracle reported non-GAAP operating margins of 47%, a five-year high water mark! The outstanding level of profitability for Oracle will likely be the source of funding for the ongoing cloud investments required to build out its cloud infrastructure at a global scale. Oracle deploys net new cloud infrastructure on a Just In Time (JIT) model where cloud bookings and consumption drive demand.
One more tidbit that bears noting…Oracle's cloud infrastructure is built on its high-performance Exadata series of hardware. This is proven, high-end hardware, proprietary to Oracle via the Sun acquisition years ago, and further fine-tuned over the past decade. This provides Oracle with another cost advantage over its rivals in that it does not have to expend capital on hardware R&D nearly as much as its competition, maintain low cloud infrastructure costs by buying its own product, and improve profit margins by selling less of a lower-margin product line.
Oracle’s Revenue Reporting Is “Cloudy”
While there are the notable strengths referenced above concerning Oracle's cloud business, all is not clear. Oracle stopped reporting cloud revenue numbers by segment last Q4 FY2018. This prevents us from seeing exactly where growth or lack thereof is occurring at a granular level. Why did Oracle make this change?
It is tempting to take the easy analyst position, or more frequently that of a Wall Street analyst, to say that Oracle must be masking weakness or they would not have reduced the transparency in its numbers. There is likely some truth to this position, but the situation is more nuanced than it appears at first glance.
On the one hand, as we have already observed, Oracle started in the cloud race quite late. As a result, its IaaS business is nascent, and the further reporting of stagnant/slow growth in this segment would likely invite pressure from the financial analyst community.
On the other hand, Oracle's application cloud business has gross margins of 86%, and its legacy license support revenues are well north of 90% gross margins. The play here may by combining the reporting of both cloud and perpetual revenue streams, Oracle sets a new baseline by which it can be measured, at a new blended gross margin. This allows Oracle to demonstrate growth materially as its cloud business grows, regardless of the cloud layer (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS).
Combining revenue streams in this manner is akin to Apple recently cutting off data disclosures of iPhone unit shipments in an attempt to shift the narrative to the velocity of the Apple Services business and the further monetization of each retained customer.
There is real merit to this approach and the underlying story of the company. Oracle’s customers must look at this level of operation by Oracle to understand how Oracle’s cloud offerings may fit into their IT strategy. There are pros and cons to Oracle’s market approach, and potential cloud customers need to understand the product landscape, applicable use cases, license options, and contract models.
- Move with intent into the Oracle cloud ecosystem. Understanding of the desired end state operating environment is crucial to selecting the most appropriate Oracle cloud service.
- Leverage weakness in Oracle’s IaaS business to drive an optimal deal. By blending spend in IaaS with primary services such as PaaS, SaaS, or through flexible license models such as Bring Your Own License (BYOL), customers will likely find an attractive entry point.
- But think long term. While the initial price might be right, it is imperative for Oracle cloud customers to carefully negotiate the Oracle Cloud Service Agreement (OCSA) terms and conditions. Chief among these is the need to secure a long-term agreement where rate increases are capped upon term renewal.
Oracle seems to have found a way to slowly increase revenues while both investing and building on its maturing cloud offerings. By weaving together new license models, deployment options, and a dizzying array of cloud applications offerings, Oracle provides a tempting narrative offering a path to the cloud in a vertically integrated manner to existing Red Stack customers.
Want to Know More?
Is it true that everything that can go wrong will go wrong? Don’t bet on it to not.
While Microsoft is not a prominent player in the RPA space now with its Power Automate solution, compared to Blue Prism, UiPath, and Automate Anywhere, its latest acquisition of Softomotive, maker of WinAutomation, demonstrates Microsoft’s dedication to mature and expand its RPA offerings.
Test data management tools offer you the ability to provision, mask, and govern the access and use of your test data, alleviating these manual, laborious and error-prone tasks from your testing, operations, and DBA teams.
When trying to implement Agile as a defined process, Scrum turned BAs or other roles into order takers with the title “product owner.” This undermines the entire value proposition of product management.
Agile systems delivery (implemented through Scrum) is quickly becoming an accepted norm in IT. But using Scrum successfully in an organization requires a deep understanding of how it works and why. For example, many of our members don’t understand the importance of selecting a Product Owner who has three ears.
Reeling from the pandemic response executed by governments all the over world, companies are accelerating their implementation of low-cost automation. That bodes well for UiPath – a leader in RPA aiming to go public this year.
Thor, the Norse God of Thunder, tells Jane Foster, the woman he’s trying to impress, that on his home world of Asgard, the realm eternal, science and magic are two sides of the same coin. Had Jane been a part of the operations teams at Google (or other mature online service providers), she would have immediately realized we have a similar technology right here on good old Earth. We call the science site reliability engineering (SRE), and service level objectives (SLO) is the magic behind it. SRE is a powerful concept for organizations that are serious about keeping their customers happy. It is therefore important for them to develop well-thought-out SLOs and make certain that management is intellectually equipped to derive valuable business perspectives from them.
Hell hath no fury like a customer not being able to access an online service when they want to. They expect the online services to always be on, always be accessible, and always treat them like there’s no one else in the world who matters more. Thank heavens then for giving these online services the ability to use site reliability engineering (SRE) to keep their customers happy, engaged, and most importantly, feeling valued.
Info-Tech members moving to Agile are frequently unsure of the role of PMs and the PMO in an Agile environment. Any organization used to traditional (Waterfall) project management will need to make adjustments in support of Agile or risk losing the benefits.