Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions
Let’s Be Realistic About a Project Manager’s Role in Product Delivery
KeyedIn’s Vice President of Marketing, Shawn Dickerson, wrote a piece on product delivery vs. project completion. In it he discusses important project management themes like business value, outcomes, and visibility. Although what he’s proposing makes sense theoretically, it’s difficult to execute realistically.
For starters, the shift from a “project-completion mindset” to a “product-focused delivery model” is not a small one. Project teams are fighting to keep up with demand and often struggle to even close projects let alone worry about the outcomes. Dickerson is correct in that staying on schedule, in scope, and under budget may not directly deliver business value, but they are important and should still be the primary focus of project teams. This is not to say that teams shouldn’t focus on outcomes as well, but Dickerson suggests this includes constant improvement of deliverables. He uses the terms “flexibility,” “innovation,” and “quick changes” to advocate for a more-iterative approach. That is simply not realistic for resource-strapped project management offices. How are they supposed to constantly revaluate deliverable criteria when many are wearing multiple hats and working on multiple projects?
Dickerson recognizes that this type of product-focused model would require frequent data updates to the PMO and that is precisely the problem. Many organizations simply don’t have consistent usable data to make these types of decisions. I agree that “resources may in fact be getting wasted, but these losses can be under the radar because by all appearances, everything is going according to plan as long as tasks are being completed.” Dickerson is right, there is a head-down mentality that can be detrimental to project outcomes. He suggests more frequent milestone and review cycles to review product delivery and resources allocation and the possible need for redistribution. This sounds like program management to me and product management can certainly have a place within the program. Check-ins, status updates, and feedback about value can and should be done at the program level.
Source: SoftwareReviews, Screenshot December 2019.
There is no denying that project outcomes are important, our Audit the Project Portfolio blueprint focuses heavily on them. However, the responsibility to manage them is at the portfolio or program level. Dickerson mentions “continued improvement” several times as the concept of the project never really ending. He says “there is always improvement and maintenance to get the most value from the work put in.” I’m on board with this comment, but whose job is it to do this? If it’s the project manager’s job, let them know and maybe balance their load so they can take on this role before they inevitably have to “move on to the next set of tasks.”
Want to Know More?
Adoption is one of the biggest challenges that organizations deal with when implementing commercial project management tools. Amid a global pandemic, this challenge has only been exasperated with many working from home.
Almost a decade has passed since Marc Andreessen’s article “Why Software Is Eating The World” passionately defended the rise of software and its potential to disrupt every industry. The ensuing decade has proven his thesis to be true.
Product management should not replace project management. They are complementary and are both integral to enabling the frequent delivery of business value.
KeyedIn released version 7.0 of its flagship product, KeyedIn Projects, featuring support for the transition to an increasingly Agile-focused IT shop. Work is assigned to Agile teams when the individual assignment is impractical.
Trello’s Brian Cervino recently provided examples and insights of how to integrate the card wall with email. He sees this feature as something that will “close the digital divide.” There’s a good debate to be had about whether removing friction from the task creation process is really helping.
JetBrains has announced a new integrated team collaboration environment aimed at DevOps engineers and project managers: Space.
Zoho Projects has recently announced two new Gantt chart features: a baseline health check and a critical path highlighter. Both are helpful, but hardly gamechangers in the project management space.
Asana Rolls Out New Project List View to Increase Clarity Around Project Tasks and Misses the Mark With Customers
To improve visibility into progress on project tasks and navigate the details of project plans, Asana has rolled out a new project List view. However, while the feature enhancement was supposed to make life easier for project managers, many users have commented that the “sections” functionality has changed, and as a result, has caused organizations a lot of grief.
To facilitate decisions around resource reassignment, Teamwork has updated its Workload overview, which shows where and how individuals are spending their time, to include each person’s capacity. Now, organizations can be more flexible and respond to changing priorities throughout the course of the project.