Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions
Is Your IT Equipment Lease Missing the Lessor’s Primary Obligation?
When leasing IT equipment, the lessor (the company providing the equipment) has one main obligation. However, most leases overlook this critical aspect completely, exposing the lessee (the organization leasing the equipment) to unnecessary risk.
Although it sounds simple, a lessor’s primary function under a lease agreement is to pay for the equipment. “Isn’t that implied or understood?” you might ask. The short answer is “yes,” but the longer answer involves a “but.” Yes, it may be implied or understood, but it often costs a lot of money to establish what was implied or understood between the parties when it is missing from an agreement, and even then, the implication or understanding may not be enforceable.
Your next question might be, “What’s the potential harm if that obligation is missing?” To illustrate, consider an extreme example of what happened to one lessee*:
- The lessor leased 500 laptops to ABC company.
- ABC began making payments to the lessor as required under the lease.
- 30 days after the lease effective date, the lessor sold the lease-payment stream to a third party.
- ABC began making payments to the third party as required.
- The lessor never paid the manufacturer for the 500 laptops.
- 90 days into the lease, the manufacturer repossessed the 500 laptops from ABC.
- ABC still had to make payments to the third party for the duration of the lease.
*The concepts remain the same, but the facts have been changed to simplify the example and preserve confidentiality.
Outrageous? You bet. Could it have been easily prevented? Absolutely!
Here are three concepts to add to your IT equipment lease to prevent a similar or related situation from happening to you:
- Create an obligation for the lessor to pay the manufacturer (or seller, as applicable) no later than 15 days after you formally accept the equipment.
- Require proof of payment to the manufacturer and clean title to the equipment in the name of the lessor.
- Reserve the right in your sole discretion: a) to terminate the lease without further obligation to the lessor if items 1. and 2. above do not occur; or b) to purchase the equipment directly from the manufacturer (or seller) and have the lease terminate automatically without any further obligation to the lessor.
With a little prevention and a couple of additional paragraphs in the lease, you can improve your position and mitigate this risk.
If you want to lease IT equipment, you have many options with regard to potential lessors (the leasing companies). In fact, some manufacturers lease equipment directly to their customers … or do they?
SortSpoke’s novel approach to machine learning answers a longstanding problem in financial services – how to efficiently extract critical data from inbound, unstructured documents at 100% data quality.
Check your contracts and you will find that the vast majority contain a force majeure clause. This provision states the conditions by which a party does not have to perform under the contract if it experiences an event beyond the party’s control.
Many contract reviewers and negotiators often assume that terms and conditions applicable to both parties must be identical or mirror each other. Nothing could be further from reality.
Beware promises of cost savings and license optimization by acquiescing to SAP’s need for you to migrate from ECC to S/4HANA. Efficiencies in the areas of license optimization are usually offset by additional costs. Use a total cost of ownership (TCO) approach to evaluate the deal.
Extending a product’s desktop functionality and user experience to a mobile platform is not always a guaranteed success. Kronos is experiencing mixed reviews for its Kronos Workforce Mobile.
Coupa, a leading source-to-pay (S2P) provider, announces planned acquisition of Exari, a leading CLM provider, for $215M in cash as contract lifecycle management (CLM) consolidation continues.
HANA is SAP’s first serious entry into the database market segment. HANA is touted as being superior in performance when working with SAP applications vs. alternate database solutions, but objective benchmarks are lacking. Additionally, the adoption of S/4HANA necessitates adoption of the HANA DB as it is the only certified solution for S/4HANA ERP.
Current SAP ECC customers have a decision to make, as SAP has announced the end of ECC support effective 2025, in effect mandating a move to its next-generation ERP solution, S/4HANA.