Comprehensive Software Reviews to make better IT decisions
Removing Risky Vendors Appears to Be Risky Business
According to a 2019 vendor risk management study published by Protiviti and Shared Assessments, organizations want to give risky vendors the boot. However, the year-over-year data indicate organizations are having a hard time actually doing it.
The report, entitled “Vendor Risk Management Benchmark Study: Running Hard to Stay in Place,” provided insights from a survey conducted during the fourth quarter of 2018 and compared those findings to the previous year. Fifty-seven percent of respondents indicated that they are likely to exit high-risk relationships with their vendors; this is up 2% over the previous year.
Source: Protiviti Vendor Risk Management Study Published 2019
While the urgency appears to be building slowly, it’s difficult to translate this “likelihood” into action. Human nature and inertia work against organizations – they only move when they have to. Even then, additional factors impede the good intentions of those involved in the decision-making process:
- The cost of switching from one vendor to another can be high.
- Contract terms may prevent implementing an exit strategy for two or more years.
- Alternate vendors in some industries may not be any less risky.
- Emerging technologies may present abnormal levels of risk for several years until the technology matures.
- Performance concerns associated with a new vendor may influence the evaluation.
Until there is a real impetus to move (such as new regulations or the occurrence of significant risk events), it will be business as usual for most organizations. The survey numbers may go up over time, but we all know talk is cheap and action costs money.
Want to Know More?
Joshua Burgin, the technical advisor to the senior vice-president at Amazon Web Services (AWS), opened AWS Summit Toronto with jabs at Oracle and Microsoft. AWS wants to position itself as customer-centric, but users of its platform might only end up locked-in to a more beneficent vendor.
Adobe has achieved near-monopoly status in the world of graphic/web design through the massive adoption of its Creative Suite product set. Far too often customers are focusing on the subscription price when there is much more value to be obtained through optimizing product selection and proactive management of end-users’ software usage.
Cambridge Semantics enhanced its Anzo platform to enable data management and analytics over both structured and unstructured data, the firm announced in an August 22 press release.
Avaya announced a partnership with RingCentral, a move that jointly strengthens the two companies’ positions in the growing cloud-based unified communications market.
The lack of robotic process automation (RPA) skills is often cited as a major challenge to RPA adoption. Blue Prism recently joined its competitors by making its RPA solution available for personal and training purposes.
C3.ai, a leading enterprise AI software provider, announced in October 2019 the launch of Smart Institutions, an AI-powered, holistic energy-as-a-service software solution for universities, municipalities, corporate campuses, and hospitals.
Bullhorn, an applicant tracking system (ATS) solution provider, has announced an improvement to its existing vendors management system (VMS) Sync offering with the deployment of "closed-loop VMS-ATS integration" that automates the transfer of candidate information from the ATS back into the VMS.
Data governance player Collibra recently announced the acquisition of SQLdep, a leading provider of automated data lineage.
Whether you are using Info-Tech’s Commodity, Operational, Strategic, Tactical (C.O.S.T.) model to classify your vendors or you arbitrarily label high spend/critical vendors as strategic, it begs the question: “Does your vendor truly view you as a strategic customer?”