2026 Top 10 Trends and Priorities for Government - Canadian

Tailored Industry Research to Empower IT Leadership

Preview Another Industry

Industry-Centric Innovation and Transformation

View Our Research and Analyst Services
01

Deliver seamless, citizen-centric public services

The Challenge

Fragmented, aging service channels are falling behind citizen expectations.

Departments still deliver through siloed systems, manual processes, and inconsistent online and in-person channels. Canadians now expect the same fast, accessible, digital-first experiences they get from the private sector, and the gap is widening.

Why It Matters

Service gaps erode public confidence and raise the cost to serve.

The Treasury Board is resetting the Policy on Service and Digital, acknowledging that outdated systems and rules too often make programs harder to deliver and harder for Canadians to access, and refocusing the rules on user-centric, outcome-driven service ("Modernizing the Policy on Service and Digital," Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, 2026). Departments that move now will lower their cost to serve, while those that delay will see demand pile onto their most expensive channels.

The Solution

Stand up modern service platforms

Deploy shared case management, workflow, and engagement platforms so services work consistently across departments and channels.

Design around the user

Apply the Government of Canada Digital Standards and accessibility requirements so services are built for the people who rely on them most.

Connect channels end to end

Integrate web, mobile, contact center, and in-person service so a citizen can start in one channel and finish in another without repeating themselves.

Back to Top
02

Build cyber resilience against escalating threats

The Challenge

Public sector systems face a faster, more aggressive threat landscape.

Ransomware, state-sponsored intrusions, and AI-enabled attacks increasingly target governments and the critical infrastructure they run. Unsanctioned employee AI use is widening the attack surface faster than many security programs can adapt.

Why It Matters

A single breach can halt essential services and expose sensitive data.

The Auditor General found significant gaps in the federal government's cybersecurity monitoring and incident response, including a major 2024 attack where poor coordination delayed the response by seven days and prolonged the attacker's access to personal information ("Cyber Security of Government Networks and Systems," Office of the Auditor General of Canada, 2025). Cyber resilience is now an enterprise accountability, not an IT department problem.

The Solution

Adopt a zero trust security model

Strengthen identity, access management, and endpoint controls across distributed and hybrid environments.

Modernize security operations

Centralize threat detection and response, and use managed detection and response where internal capacity falls short.

Govern shadow AI as a security risk

Set explicit policy, monitoring, and enforcement for employee use of external AI tools to contain data exposure.

Back to Top
03

Turn data into a trusted decision-making asset

The Challenge

Fragmented data ownership blocks insight and AI readiness.

Inconsistent governance, disconnected systems, and unclear stewardship keep departments from turning the data they hold into evidence for decisions. Many organizations have data strategies but lack the governance to act on them.

Why It Matters

Weak data foundations make every downstream AI and analytics investment underperform.

The Year Two progress report on the federal Data Strategy shows the government building enterprise data reference standards and Chief Data Officer of Canada accountabilities, while flagging persistent gaps in data governance and sharing (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, 2025). Establishing trusted data now is the precondition for AI, not a parallel track.

The Solution

Establish enterprise data governance

Define ownership, quality, classification, and stewardship, with accountability set at the executive level.

Build and maintain a data inventory

Document what data exists, where it lives, and who controls it to enable sharing, AI risk classification, and sovereignty compliance.

Set data quality standards before scaling AI

Adopt the GC Enterprise Data Reference Standards so analytics and AI draw on consistent, trusted data.

Back to Top
04

Close the cyber, cloud, and AI skills gap

The Challenge

Modernization is constrained by shortages in cyber, cloud, and AI talent.

The public sector competes for scarce digital specialists while preparing its existing workforce for technology-driven change. Outdated operating models and classification rigidity slow hiring and retention further.

Why It Matters

Workforce readiness determines whether technology investments deliver any return.

The Government of Canada Digital Talent Strategy recognizes a global shortage of digital talent that the public service is not immune to, and now requires departments to source internal talent before contracting externally (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, 2024). Treating talent as an enabler, not an afterthought, is what makes modernization stick.

The Solution

Build tiered digital and AI literacy

Deliver role-based training across staff, managers, and technical teams through the Canada School of Public Service and specialized offerings.

Grow internal talent pipelines

Use the GC Digital Talent Platform, apprenticeships, and intern streams to reduce dependence on external IT contractors.

Fix the operating-model barriers

Address classification rigidity and create modern product and delivery roles so skilled people can do the work they were hired for.

Back to Top
05

Adopt AI responsibly and accountably

The Challenge

AI adoption is outpacing the governance needed to deploy it safely.

Departments are under pressure to use AI in public-facing services while managing privacy, bias, transparency, and accountability risks. Public-sector AI carries a higher accountability bar than private-sector use.

Why It Matters

Deploying AI without governance risks public-trust failures and compliance exposure.

Under the Treasury Board Directive on Automated Decision-Making, existing systems must meet updated Algorithmic Impact Assessment, bias-testing, and explanation requirements by June 24, 2026 (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, 2024). The right sequence is to assess the foundations, govern the deployment, then accelerate.

The Solution

Assess AI readiness before deploying

Complete a foundations review of governance, data, and accountability, and close gaps before launching public-facing AI.

Apply risk-tiered governance

Run internal administrative AI with lighter controls, and require impact assessment, transparency, and explainability for decisions that affect citizens.

Complete algorithmic impact assessments

Document bias testing, explainability, and recourse, and design human-in-the-loop controls for autonomous systems from day one.

Back to Top
06

Assert sovereignty over Canadian data and infrastructure

The Challenge

Reliance on foreign-controlled platforms is now a strategic exposure.

Canadian organizations depend heavily on foreign-owned cloud, software, and digital infrastructure. Geopolitical uncertainty and foreign jurisdictional access are forcing leaders to reassess control over their own data and systems.

Why It Matters

Data residency alone does not equal sovereignty, and the gap carries legal and operational risk.

Under the Canadian Sovereign AI Compute Strategy, Budget 2024 committed $2 billion to build Canadian-owned, Canadian-located compute where sensitive data is processed and stored in Canada, and the government has now opened applications for its sovereign AI supercomputing program (Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, 2024). Organizations that address sovereignty proactively will accelerate modernization, while those that ignore it will have constraints imposed on them.

The Solution

Assess sovereignty posture across key risks

Evaluate exposure across data residency, cloud jurisdiction, procurement, and AI system control, and tackle the highest-risk dependencies first.

Build interoperable, exit-ready architectures

Reduce lock-in through multicloud governance, API-first integration, and contract terms that preserve Canadian operational control.

Align AI and infrastructure to sovereign capacity

Apply residency requirements to sensitive data and AI training sets, and weigh Canadian and allied-jurisdiction options such as sovereign compute.

Back to Top
07

Modernize aging systems and retire technical debt

The Challenge

Aging systems and accumulated technical debt threaten service continuity.

Legacy applications, outdated infrastructure, and complex vendor landscapes make modernization slow and risky. Technical debt blocks progress on AI, data governance, and service modernization alike.

Why It Matters

Outdated systems are a daily risk to the services Canadians depend on.

The Auditor General found that only 38% of roughly 7,500 federal IT applications were healthy, leaving the government on track for just 45% by 2030 against a 60% target (Office of the Auditor General of Canada, 2023). Treating infrastructure as the enabling foundation, not a standalone IT project, is what unlocks every other priority.

The Solution

Build enterprise architecture capability

Establish architecture review, change control, and multicloud management to manage complexity and curb new technical debt.

Rationalize the application portfolio

Retire low-value and redundant applications and direct modernization spend to mission-critical systems first.

Adopt cloud-smart hosting and predictive maintenance

Use the GC Cloud Adoption Strategy and asset analytics to migrate workloads and catch infrastructure risks before they fail.

Back to Top
08

Do more with less through modern operating models

The Challenge

Departments must deliver more under tighter budgets and faster decision cycles.

Rising service demand meets constrained spending, heightened accountability, and slow, manual approval processes. Fragmented governance and disconnected data delay the decisions leaders need to make.

Why It Matters

Every modernization dollar is now scrutinized for measurable return.

Budget 2025 launched a Comprehensive Expenditure Review targeting $60 billion in savings over five years and pledged to cut spending on management and other consulting services by 20% within three years (Government of Canada, 2025). Faster, evidence-based decisions and leaner operating models are what make those savings sustainable.

The Solution

Adopt shared and managed service models

Use shared infrastructure and managed services for functions where in-house capacity is not cost effective.

Automate high-volume processes

Apply workflow automation to rules-based, high-volume processes where return on investment is most measurable.

Build IT portfolio management and real-time dashboards

Connect investment decisions to fiscal outcomes and give executives live visibility into performance, demand, and risk.

Back to Top
09

Streamline procurement and vendor oversight

The Challenge

Slow procurement strands modernization budgets and entrenches legacy vendors.

Lengthy cycles, growing compliance requirements, and expanding reliance on third-party and AI vendors delay delivery. Procurement choices increasingly determine how much control an organization keeps over its own digital infrastructure.

Why It Matters

Procurement is both a delivery bottleneck and a lever for value and control.

The Parliamentary Budget Officer found that contracted IT services in the departments it examined cost 22% to 25.7% more than the equivalent in-house work, even as federal outsourcing reached a record $20.7 billion in 2023-24 ("Fiscal Cost of Task-Based IT Contracting," Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer, 2025). Disciplined procurement and vendor oversight, including residency and exit terms, decide both cost and how much operational control an organization keeps.

The Solution

Stand up a Vendor Management Office

Govern vendor performance, risk, and relationships, with extra rigor for high-dependency technology and AI suppliers.

Modernize sourcing and contract management

Use digital procurement platforms to streamline sourcing, contracting, and supplier management.

Apply AI-ready and sovereignty criteria

Use the Government of Canada AI Source List and add explainability, bias, residency, and exit terms to vendor evaluation.

Back to Top
10

Build trusted digital identity for Canadians

The Challenge

Canadians lack a consistent, trusted way to prove who they are online.

Identity verification is fragmented across departments and jurisdictions, forcing citizens through repeated, paper-based, or in-person checks. Without trusted digital identity, seamless and secure service delivery stalls.

Why It Matters

Trusted digital identity is the missing layer beneath every digital service.

The Pan-Canadian Trust Framework (PCTF) sets interoperable, privacy-first standards that let public-sector and private-sector identity services verify one another, and its steward, the Digital ID and Authentication Council of Canada, now publishes a Digital Trust Adoption Dashboard tracking digital-identity progress across provinces and territories ("DIACC Unviels [sic] Digital Trust Adoption Dashboard," DIACC, 2025). Building this layer now, in step with provincial and territorial partners, is what makes digital-first service realistic.

The Solution

Adopt the Pan-Canadian Trust Framework

Align identity and credential programs to PCTF assurance levels so verification is interoperable across jurisdictions.

Partner on provincial digital ID

Connect to provincial credential programs such as the BC Services Card and align with federal credential plans rather than building in isolation.

Embed privacy and accessibility by design

Meet Privacy Act obligations and Accessible Canada Act requirements, with consent and data minimization built into every identity flow.

Back to Top

Comprehensive Government - Canadian Industry Coverage

Filters

Testimonials

“I don’t have months to spend to find the answers or get a paperweight of a document that nobody understands. To be able to take the Info-Tech Workshop deliverable, present it to my manager, and he gets it in one go—that’s the value to me.”

Anna Beatty, CIO, Ottawa Police Service

View Full Case Study

“With all the change that was happening, we reached out to Info-Tech for best-practice research and advice. We wanted to move initiatives forward and collaborate with experts, rather than do it all alone.”

Catherine Fitzgerald, IT Director, Municipality of Chatham-Kent

View Full Case Study

"The perception had always been that IT was making decisions on its own. That has changed significantly with the IT Steering Committee – it has given IT an aura of credibility."

Kari Kleven, Corporate Services Manager, IT, City of Kawartha Lakes

View Full Case Study
More Case Studies

Our People

Cole Cioran headshot

Cole Cioran

Managing Partner, Canadian Public Sector

View Full Bio
Matt Bourne headshot

Matt Bourne

Senior Executive Counselor

View Full Bio
Christine Coz headshot

Christine Coz

Executive Counselor

View Full Bio
Alaisdar Graham headshot

Alaisdar Graham

Executive Counselor

View Full Bio
Theresa Hughes headshot

Theresa Hughes

Executive Counselor

View Full Bio
Rita Lazar-Tippe headshot

Rita Lazar-Tippe

Executive Counselor

View Full Bio
Rob Meikle headshot

Rob Meikle

Executive Counselor

View Full Bio
Graham Price headshot

Graham Price

Executive Counselor

View Full Bio