Comprehensive Software Reviews to make better IT decisions
Simplify Manual Testing With Testpad
Automation can significantly enhance delivery throughput and product quality, but it can be costly to implement and maintain. This is particularly true for tests that are complex, mimic human behavior, or are rarely executed. Exploratory, user experience, and user acceptance testing are just a few test types where manual practices are the best approach.
Many of today’s testing tools are built for quality assurance (QA) teams who have significant technical skills and will be using these tools as platforms for automation. However, the tool’s workflow, the degree of documentation, and the setup can be overkill for QA roles performing certain manual tests. Advertised as a “spreadsheet-checklist hybrid on steroids,” Testpad provides a test case management platform that maintains the feel of Microsoft Excel (which is still a popular test case management tool) and minimizes the technical jargon and specifications in the documentation. A key Testpad goal is to motivate everyone to test on a common platform whether they are in a business or IT role or even external to the organization. Testpad is gradually expanding its integration partners; qTest, Jira, GitHub, and Pivotal Tracker are just a few out-of-the-box integrations currently available.
Testpad takes a unique approach to test management. It focuses on enhancing the manual testing experience by providing intuitive features that are natural to both technical and non-technical roles. However, organizations looking for automation capabilities will likely need to look at other options as Testpad’s focus is on manual testing.
Want to Know More?
RPA projects fail more often than one would expect. The ease with which RPA tools allow workflows to get designed and implemented makes it easy to avoid building a strong foundation for the work being done.
We live in a metrics-fixated world where having more metrics is always thought to be better than having less, and Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) metrics are no exception. But the truth is that any badly chosen or managed metric will do more harm than good to your organization. To avoid these pitfalls, take ownership for SDLC metrics away from managers and put it into the hands of those who can best manage it: your development teams.
Robotic process automation (RPA) success is dependent on the right business processes to automate. Blueprint helps identify the right places to apply RPA with its Enterprise Automation Suite.
Human bias towards variety has pushed software-supported products and services pressure tech teams to deliver more and deliver faster. Teams have responded admirably by upping their speed but with an unintended consequence: the increasing scourge of technical debt.
Appian, a prominent low-code development vendor, announced the acquisition of Novayre Solutions SL, developer of the Jidoka RPA platform. This acquisition bolsters its image as a viable vendor to empower the business with development capabilities.
A prevalent urban legend in enterprise tech is that DevOps and Agile are not ready for tackling transformation at scale. At Info-Tech Research Group, we believe it’s the other way around. DevOps practices like CI/CD are being used by digital banking startups for fintech products. They are leveraging cloud services for demand management and capacity planning but what about the “too big to fail” banks, with global outreach and massive investments in legacy tech?
Agile Tips the Balance Toward Success for Most Projects (but It Takes Time and Effort to Become Agile)
In 1994 the Standish Group published its first CHAOS Report, which famously reported that only about 16% of software projects were completed on time and on budget. Over the years, this staggeringly low success rate has thankfully more than doubled (albeit with a modified definition of success).
Although pair programming is not a widely employed technique, there are reasons for using it, even if you aren’t using extreme programming.
There is a difference between something’s form and its true function. To really understand if a tool is useful for you, study its function, because the form can always change (and in some cases, become misleading). Agile is not immune to such corruption.