Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions
Choose a Right-Sized Videoconferencing Hardware Solution
Upgrading one’s videoconferencing hardware is an important long-term investment that revolves around several decision points. This note offers a process for thinking about these decision points.
1. CapEx or OpEx?
The first decision concerns whether to choose a CapEx or an OpEx model. The CapEx model sees an organization purchase their videoconferencing hardware outright. If the organization is clear about the exact amount of equipment required, the benefits of this model are that the organization has full control over their equipment (including when to choose maintenance or upgrades) and there is only a large one-off payment at the initial purchase of the equipment.
However, the CapEx model does not easily allow for scalability. If the organization suddenly needs to expand or (given the increase of remote workers) contract their physical videoconference rooms and its equipment, one will be caught short. One will either need to suddenly increase the hardware available (that will require more time and money for installation and training) or have unused hardware, leading to a poor ROI.
The OpEx model – in this context, also known as the Hardware as a Service (HaaS) model – does allow for scalability. In this model, the vendor supplies and maintains the hardware, allowing the organization to outsource ongoing service costs. Of course, the HaaS model requires a (usually annual) subscription fee, which may increase from a sudden need to scale. Choosing this option depends on context – if one is expecting a large increase in usability of conferencing rooms or an influx of new employees, HaaS can help meet any sudden surge in demand.
2. End-user requirements
The market leaders in the videoconferencing hardware space – from Cisco to Microsoft – will have most end-user requirements met as table stakes capabilities. What will be important, then, is knowing which capabilities your end users need, lest one ends up paying for a solution that is not fully leveraged.
Typical requirements include:
- Responsive touch-screen display
- Video/audio conferencing with dial-in features
- Integrated cameras and speaker bars
Other specifications (size, weight, RAM, and so on) will come down to specific use cases. To best meet end-user requirements, pick a few archetypical use cases and identify the capabilities required for those use cases. This will frame your search, narrowing down capabilities that are necessities compared to nice-to-haves.
3. Integrations and cost
It is best practice to keep tools (hardware and software) as integrated as possible. This allows for secure information share on a unified platform, ease of use and accessibility for the end user, and little friction switching between apps and equipment. As such, one must consider what current software is being used in-house and whether this will integrate with the incoming video conferencing hardware.
Notably, some market leaders’ videoconferencing hardware will be purposefully built for their own software solutions. For instance, the Microsoft Surface Hub integrates very well with Office 365 applications but does not natively support Zoom or Cisco Webex. It is possible to use the Surface Hub for non-Microsoft videoconferencing software; however, the inevitable friction of making this work can lead to end-user dissatisfaction. This same issue applies to the Cisco Webex Room Series for Webex, and Zoom Room hardware is built by contracted partners to host Zoom software specifically.
It may be more cost effective to choose hardware that broadly integrates across videoconferencing software for a lower cost. Often, an organization has multiple videoconferencing software solutions used by different end users. While it is best practice to rationalize these software solutions, the short-term might require videoconferencing hardware that is agile enough to accommodate for this range of software. In these instances, choosing Polycom and LogiTech hardware might be a better fit. Though these latter vendors will not have the bells and whistles that Microsoft and Cisco have, they may well be the right-sized hardware.
Of course, the cost of videoconferencing hardware does not end at the price tag. As such, when considering the more expensive options – such as Surface Hub and the Webex Room Series – bear in mind the range of other costs that cover installation, training, support, and (if one is not using a HaaS model) maintenance.
4. Got the hardware and are now interested in the software?
See SoftwareReviews’ data quadrant report on web conferencing.
Source: SoftwareReviews Web Conferencing Data Quadrant. Accessed May 25, 2020
Want to Know More?
On September 1, 2020, Info-Tech briefed with Cisco about current and upcoming features of its Unified Webex app for September. Significant changes include the introduction of Cisco Webex Classrooms and the Webex Control Hub, with notable updates also coming to Webex for Education, Webex Meetings, and Webex Teams.
On September 4, 2020, Info-Tech briefed with Zoho about current and upcoming features of Zoho Workplace, a global enterprise collaboration platform. Organizations, especially SMBs, that want to look outside of Microsoft’s and Google’s office productivity suite duopoly should consider shortlisting Zoho Workplace as a viable option.
Enterprise Connect’s virtual conference and expo for 2020 featured a wide variety of sessions on communications and collaboration for the enterprise. In this fourteenth note of fourteen, I report on Recon Research’s latest study on how COVID-19 has cemented web conferencing as the future of the workplace.
Zoho Workplace – a global enterprise collaboration platform – has reported that it is now supporting 15 million users and is experiencing a surge in usage for its business applications. However, compared to Microsoft’s Office 365 and Google’s G Suite, Zoho still has a long way to go in this marketspace.
Google has announced several updates to its G-Suite offering, which aims to heavily integrate and better secure its teamwork applications. The move represents a clear attempt by Google to directly compete with Microsoft’s office productivity suite, with several of the G-Suite updates mirroring the logical architecture of Office 365.
As of July 1, 2020, over 70,000 small business users receiving their Microsoft 365 services from Navisite will now receive them from Intermedia. The move means that Navisite’s users now have access to a range of Intermedia offerings, including Unite, Contact Center, and AnyMeeting.
Zoom recently announced Zoom for Home: an all-in-one hardware and software for home users designed to enable the work-from-home user with a single home appliance for web conferencing, phone calling, and interactive whiteboard collaboration.
Thinking about choosing a new software vendor but don't know where to start? Narrow down your shortlist by focusing on software that has received an Info-Tech Research Group award. New data from SoftwareReviews shows that organizations reported higher satisfaction when they switched to software that had received an Info-Tech award.
University researchers used artificial intelligence in an experiment to determine the extent of privacy risks that come with the use of this web conferencing tool. Publicly available data scraped from social networks was cross-referenced as part of this research.