Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions
Leverage the Data in Your QA Tools to Strengthen Testing
A lot of data is captured in the tools you use for product delivery. These insights give you a full picture of the health of your products and focus your tests on the scenarios that matter.
Given the flexibility and customization of the reporting capabilities of your QA tools, you can essentially measure anything that is meaningful to your business and IT management over time. However, this data can also be used to quickly and proactively identify how to focus your limited resources to increase quality.
Your QA tools captures the results of the various QA activities you perform throughout your product delivery process like static code analysis and metrics, unit testing, functional testing, and system testing. Aggregating all of this data together and analyzing it will reveal trends and patterns of known and potential defects and issues that can occur while the product is developing (i.e. defect forecasting).
This analyzed data can also identify the various user and system scenarios that should be tested but are not easily found through common test design practices (e.g. state diagrams, data flow diagrams, use case and business process flows).
Defect forecasting is still a differentiating feature among QA tools despite the capability being available for quite some time. One of the leaders in this space is Parasoft and its Process Intelligence Engine (PIE) that triggers alerts in your workflows based on observations previously made in your delivery process.
Micro Focus offers a Predictive Analytics Tool for its ALM products to enable continuous assessment of pipelines. Other tools in this space do not provide that same level of sophistication but enable static code analysis and continuous source code inspection capabilities that can indicate potential issues without the execution of the code themselves, such as Perforce’s Helix QAC and VisualCodeGrepper.
There is significant potential in the use of QA tool data to improve quality in the right areas. While much of the predictive analytics capabilities are bells and whistles today, it will only be a matter of time before we start to see organizations looking to enhance their automation practices and expand test coverage using these capabilities. Focus your tooling selection on addressing your core QA practice until these forecasting capabilities mature in the industry.
Want to Know More?
The impact of COVID-19, as it became a global pandemic in Q1 of 2020, has affected user sentiment toward software during a growing period of fear, uncertainty, and doubt. To analyze the impact, SoftwareReviews compared Satisfaction (willingness to recommend to a peer), ability to deliver Business Value (fair cost to value), and Likeliness to Renew prior to March 10 and post March 10.
An enterprise application selection or implementation has most likely been heavily impacted by COVID-19. Do not hit the brakes; stopping and restarting projects increases the risk of failure. Slow down or speed up? Which is the right strategy for your organization?
The math did not add up for SAP to sunset license support for legacy ECC/Business Suite 7 clients, as we predicted. I’ve fielded numerous calls asking, “Will SAP hold firm on its 2025 end-of-support date?" We finally have SAP’s answer: a resounding “NO.”
SAP customers seeking to move to S/4HANA must navigate four distinct license models, each tied to a separate deployment model (perpetual license, subscription via HEC, S/4HANA Cloud Single-Tenant, or S/4HANA Public Cloud). This note explores the license characteristics and commercial options available when choosing to procure perpetual licenses for S/4HANA.
SAP’s native-cloud play through S/4HANA dangled the hopes of a simplified license structure to SAP customers. Instead, SAP customers now must navigate four distinct license models, each tied to a separate deployment model.
SAP S/4HANA and HANA Licensing Series – Part IV: ECC End-of-Support Date in 2025 Looms Large for CIOs
SAP continues to claim robust adoption of S/4HANA while cajoling customers to migrate. Should ECC customers cave into the demands and promises of S/4HANA? Or should they stay the course and call SAP’s bluff on the looming end-of-support date?
Oracle reported slightly better-than-expected Q2 FY20 results, but despite substantial revenue numbers and high growth areas such as Oracle Cloud, Fusion ERP, and Autonomous Database, it’s unclear when these market segments will accelerate revenue growth materially.
Infor doubles down on better implementations with Signavio’s process mining and intelligence technology. The partnership will leverage the Signavio web-based business process modeling and intelligence tool to further accelerate the decision-making process.
Artificial intelligence continues to fuel the arms race among ERP vendors. Earlier this year, Oracle announced that it has extended the AI (machine learning, to be more precise) capabilities within the ERP Cloud and EPM Cloud products.