Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions
Backup Solution Providers: Your First Mate on the Voyage Over the Sea of Change With Cloud Backups
Backup and recovery operations was once a set-it-and-forget it design architecture with a static reference architecture. Disk-to-disk-to-tape, with standard rotation schedules. Then along came the cloud, disrupting everything about how data is stored and processed. Today, change is the only constant in the relationship between the cloud and backup and recovery operations, and it is no longer a task delegated to the most junior operator. Now, more than ever, organizations are looking for their solution providers to lean in and help them navigate the shifting tides of “cloud backup.”
As cloud backup evolves, solution providers must act as guides
Even the definition of the term “cloud backup” has been subject to change. Back in 2012, at the dawn of public cloud computing, cloud backup would have referred to the use of public cloud storage as a container for tertiary backup data; a strategy often employed to replace large tape libraries and offsite storage and retrieval services. A few years later, a seminar on cloud backup would have explored new recovery strategies for data that was stored in public cloud Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) and Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) environments. Now in 2021 and beyond, over half an organization’s data is stored in the public cloud services, cited in Flexera’s 2020 State of the Cloud Report. This movement has forced the cloud backup discussion beyond data protection in IaaS and PaaS and now includes the extraction of content from Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) environments such as Office 365 products and Salesforce.com.
As data moves from one underlying platform to another, its backup strategy must be revisited. We all went through this with the shift from bare metal to virtualization, the only difference now is that the changes are occurring more frequently than the normal refresh cycle of our backup and recovery infrastructure.
This pace of change puts pressure on the
solution providers to act as guides and assist their customers in navigating
the velocity of changes that are impacting their data protection plans. Their
role here is to offer solutions that are scalable and adaptable to these changes,
whether that stems from the solution’s technical architecture or its license
model. Done correctly, this will not only support but even accelerate the
customer’s navigation to the cloud.
Backup software is a key utility in an organization’s cloud migration strategy
In the earliest stages of their journey, organizations are often looking at using cloud-native storage in lieu of large banks of tape drives. This is where we need software, like Micro Focus Data Protector, installed on the media server to support connectivity to a cloud-native repository, such as an AWS S3 bucket, a Microsoft Azure Blob store, or even a Ceph object store running in a private cloud. Optionally, the solution could also integrate with a cloud storage gateway or backup appliance that facilitates connectivity to the cloud storage backend. These intermediary devices provide the benefit of faster restore times because of their proximity to the media server while still leveraging the cloud as a storage platform for data with more forgiving restore time objectives.
Further on in their journey, IT operations groups will be deploying new workloads in IaaS and PaaS environments, alongside traditional data center resident workloads, looking to balance the value and risk of cloud in a hybrid approach. The challenges this shift brings to traditional backup and recovery operations are multifaceted. When a solution provider can provide backup from one deployment area, such as a data center, and recovery to another one, such as a public cloud, their solution is not only functioning as a data protection mechanism but can also act as a critical lynchpin in that organization’s migration to the cloud. This is also where the scaling unit for recovery software licensing tends to shift from host based to capacity based. Info-Tech has seen organizations favor vendors with more flexible licensing models that support pay-as-you-grow consumption models, which are more likely to be based on data backup capacity (sometimes even after deduplication) rather than on an arbitrary number of hosts.
Data protection and SaaS
In a report cited by Information Age, revenue for SaaS is expected to be over $140 million by 2022, which is nearly the same as the combined projections for IaaS ($80 million) and PaaS ($72 million). While this isn’t a direct measure of data, it is certainly indicative about where data will reside. Almost every single organization that Info-Tech Research Group has worked closely with on their cloud strategy has an increasing SaaS footprint, and many of those organizations have adopted a SaaS-first vision. Just as organizations needed their solution providers to solve the hybrid cloud problem, they’re also expecting them to integrate directly with major SaaS vendors. Microsoft Office 365, Google Workplace, Salesforce.com, and Adobe Creative Cloud are just some examples of SaaS providers that are holding data that enterprise IT is seeking to protect. This is the field that the backup and recovery market will be playing on in the years to come.
Through all this change there has been one constant: recovery and availability services remain business critical. No more critical than they were ever before perhaps, but due to the added complexity that IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS bring, providing these services effectively is harder! A comprehensive data protection strategy must now encompass multiple delivery models from SaaS to IaaS while still protecting data resident in the data center. Ensure your backup software vendor should be approached as a partner who can help you navigate these shifting tides.
Want to Know More?
- SoftwareReviews.com: Best Backup and Availability Software
- Info-Tech.com: Enterprise Backup and Availability Market Trends and Buyer’s Guide
- Info-Tech.com: Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan
Acronis Offers a Unique Endpoint Protection and Data Recovery Package Tailored for the Small to Medium-Sized Business
Acronis hopes to overtake many competitors in the data recovery and endpoint protection solution space by forging partnerships with many MSSPs and appealing to the SMB market. The company has doubled down by hiring the former CEO of GoDaddy, who is committed to reinvesting in its technology and increasing and improving its product line.
More than ever, cybersecurity solutions are core to any MSPs offering. No longer should technology service providers be farming this out to dedicated security providers. Trust and peace of mind are the core tenets of what they are selling and solutions like Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud can provide the platform upon which to deliver on those promises.
Veeam to be acquired by Insight Partners for US$5 billion: On January 9, 2020, Veeam announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement of purchase with Insight Partners.
Zerto 7.5 adds support for Azure Active Directory Managed Service Identity (MSI), which simplifies authentication to Azure services while improving security.
Quest Software’s NetVault Backup v12.4 release adds support for OneDrive to its existing Office 365 (O365) backup capabilities, enabling its customers to better align backup strategy to business requirements, and helping Quest Software keep up with other O365 backup offerings.
Veeam has rolled out new backup features that integrate with Amazon S3 to help users save on storage costs for their backups. This tech is some serious secret sauce.
HPE has ported over InfoSight Predictive Analytics platform from its 2017 acquisition of Nimble to its SimpliVity line, adding AI to the hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI), as announced in an Oct. 28 press release.
Veeam is still running strong in the enterprise and cloud backup markets two business quarters into its 2019 fiscal year. Veeam has announced its second quarter results and the numbers are still impressive.
Cyberattacks are terrible and require the same dedication to overcome them as would any other disaster response effort. Just like natural disasters, cyberattacks cause millions of dollars in damage, disrupt infrastructure, and impede citizens from their daily lives.