Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions
Agile Skills Don’t Revolve Around Ceremonies and Procedures: They’re About Traits and Values.
Agile skills require an evolution in people’s soft skills and behaviors. Handling ambiguity, being agreeable, and being extroverted are some of what’s important for an effective agile team.
Scrum.Org and McKinsey & Company collaborated on a study to explore the values and traits of individuals who make up successful agile teams. This focuses little on technical acuity but provides an important perspective on better ways to recruit and coach teams.
The study talks about two sets of factors:
1. Personality Traits
These are innate and acquired traits that make an agile team culture bloom:
Handling the unknown – The nature of agility requires a high degree of flexibility. Individuals and teams that handle ambiguity well are able to focus on goals and prioritize what's important instead of needing to address every single detail before starting their work.
Being agreeable – In competitive corporate cultures, agreeableness was an unexpected result for McKinsey. Google's study of high-performing teams showed that trust (an aspect of agreeableness) was important. So was straightforwardness, which enables being open and frank with one's viewpoints while being courteous and courageous enough to voice opinions that conflict with the team’s.
Extroversion – While not required for all roles in agile, being extroverted helps roles that involve communicating with stakeholders and customers (product owner, product management, team leaders) have an easier time.
Introversion – However, in a team that is creative and high performing, introverts can be important as they are great listeners and are better at channeling great talent and putting those people in the spotlight.
2. Work Values
Certain values are linked with success in agile teams:
Pride on what they do – Great agile teams take ownership in the product that they deliver. For these teams, pride in the product outcome itself sits higher than the process of making the product. This is more than just being happy or content. It means a desire to be associated with the product and taking ownership of its values and contributions.
Being customer focused – Quite simply, everyone must care about the customer. This allows teams to achieve three important ends:
- They find the most economic ways to deliver value as quickly as possible.
- They have a shared responsibility for the final outcome – the customer is a regular part of the process.
- They know exactly who they are helping, consequently humanizing the effort and increasing the motivation to get it right for them.
Self-directed – This is not an innate value but is gained over time. It requires that teams already are open to change, understand the impacts, and are confident to adjust accordingly.
Too often, when we think about agile, we think about hard skills like software development. This is not to say that software engineering isn't an essential skill for someone on an agile software development team. However, it's an essential skill for someone on any kind of software team, so it’s not unique to agile! McKinsey’s focus on behavioral traits highlights important differences (agile skills). However, it misses a critical aspect of being agile: you can no longer live comfortably within a tight specialist box.
Atlassian, the creators of Jira and Confluence, also have a serious agile culture. They say that specialists are not a defining trait of an agile team. We agree, but the journey to being agile requires people to go from specialists (I-shaped – being prescriptive) to generalizing specialists (T-shaped – doing agile) to true versatilists (V-shaped – being agile).
Source: Info-Tech's Implement Agile Practices That Work blueprint. Accessed February 26, 2020
Want to Know More?
To learn more about the agile skills and values that are truly important, please refer to our research:
Traditional accounting practices are tailor made for waterfall project management. Organizations that have transitioned to the use of standing product teams using Agile and DevOps need to transform their accounting practices as well or they will leave valuable capital expenditure dollars on the table.
IBM is changing the terms of its ubiquitous Passport Advantage agreement to remove entitled discounts on over 5,000 on-premises software products, resulting in an immediate price increase for IBM Software & Support (S&S) across its vast customer landscape.
So you’ve gone Agile. You do daily scrums, retrospectives, and all the “right” Agile ceremonies. But still your organization isn’t quite convinced. It is now critical to balance the drivers and goals of both Agile and traditional thinking in order to achieve organizational success.
Do you feel like your Agile teams are treading water – going through the motions but never going anywhere? It’s a risk, and practices such as daily standups, retrospectives, and demonstrations need to be used wisely or you risk losing discipline to meeting fatigue.
Stakeholders expect the speed and responsiveness of product delivery does not come at the expense of quality. QA tools offer retailers the ability to continuously ensure both business and technical quality standards are upheld, but these tools should not be viewed as a silver bullet.
When trying to implement Agile as a defined process, Scrum turned BAs or other roles into order takers with the title “product owner.” This undermines the entire value proposition of product management.
No matter how good your product roadmap and backlog are, they are only as good as your audience’s ability to understand your vision and priority.
The scrum master is like the conductor of an orchestra, ensuring that every piece fits together at the right time to create something greater than the sum of the parts. You don’t have to know how to play each instrument, but you do have to understand what each part contributes to the overall masterpiece.
Tools are important to product teams, but only when they support solid people and processes.