Latest Research


This content is currently locked.

Your current Info-Tech Research Group subscription does not include access to this content. Contact your account representative to gain access to Premium SoftwareReviews.

Contact Your Representative
Or Call Us:
+1-888-670-8889 (US/CAN) or
+1-703-340-1171 (International)
OpenText  Static Application Security Testing Logo
OpenText  Static Application Security Testing Logo
OpenText Corporation

OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Composite Score
7.3 /10
CX Score
7.5 /10
Category
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
7.3 /10

What is OpenText Static Application Security Testing?

Traditional SAST tools often require tuning and expertise, overwhelming teams with false positives. Others are easy to use, but miss vulnerabilities. OpenText™ Static Application Security Testing (Fortify) (SAST) enables DevSecOps with precise vulnerability detection, broad language support, and seamless CI/CD integration. AI-driven insights help developers prioritize and resolve vulnerabilities efficiently, reducing security risk across the SDLC.

Company Details


Need Assistance?

We're here to help you with understanding our reports and the data inside to help you make decisions.

Get Assistance

Awards & Recognition

OpenText Static Application Security Testing won the following awards in the Application Security Testing category

OpenText Static Application Security Testing Ratings

Real user data aggregated to summarize the product performance and customer experience.
Download the entire Product Scorecard to access more information on OpenText Static Application Security Testing.

Product scores listed below represent current data. This may be different from data contained in reports and awards, which express data as of their publication date.

89 Likeliness to Recommend

3
Since last award

92 Plan to Renew

8
Since last award

86 Satisfaction of Cost Relative to Value

2
Since last award


{y}
{name}

Emotional Footprint Overview

Product scores listed below represent current data. This may be different from data contained in reports and awards, which express data as of their publication date.

+81 Net Emotional Footprint

The emotional sentiment held by end users of the software based on their experience with the vendor. Responses are captured on an eight-point scale.

How much do users love OpenText Static Application Security Testing?

15% Negative
3% Neutral
82% Positive

Pros

  • Respectful
  • Helps Innovate
  • Fair
  • Efficient Service

Feature Ratings

Average 76

Vulnerability Scanning

88

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

83

SDLC Integration

81

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

79

Integrated Development Environment (IDE) plug-in

79

Risk Scoring

78

Mobile Application Security Testing

76

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

74

Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)

73

Container Security Testing

70

False Positive Remediation

70

Vendor Capability Ratings

Average 79

Ease of Implementation

86

Usability and Intuitiveness

85

Ease of IT Administration

84

Business Value Created

82

Availability and Quality of Training

82

Vendor Support

80

Breadth of Features

75

Ease of Customization

74

Quality of Features

74

Ease of Data Integration

73

Product Strategy and Rate of Improvement

71

OpenText Static Application Security Testing Reviews

Casey G.

  • Role: Information Technology
  • Industry: Finance
  • Involvement: End User of Application
Validated Review
Verified Reviewer

Submitted Jan 2025

Securing Code, Securing Confidence

Likeliness to Recommend

8 /10

What differentiates OpenText Static Application Security Testing from other similar products?

What makes it unique is the depth of its vulnerability detection across a wide range of programming languages

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

during a recent code review, it flagged a potential SQL injection risk in a critical module, providing clear guidance on how to fix it. The speed and accuracy of the analysis save countless hours compared to manual reviews.

What do you dislike most about this product?

Navigating large reports or filtering results for specific issues can sometimes feel cumbersome. Additionally, the licensing costs may limit its use for smaller teams.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Pair it with a CI/CD pipeline for seamless integration and real-time feedback during development.

Pros

  • Continually Improving Product
  • Reliable
  • Efficient Service
  • Inspires Innovation

Ram S.

  • Role: Information Technology
  • Industry: Engineering
  • Involvement: IT Development, Integration, and Administration
Validated Review
Verified Reviewer

Submitted Apr 2026

Powerful static code analysis tool

Likeliness to Recommend

9 /10

What differentiates OpenText Static Application Security Testing from other similar products?

Deep static code analysis with high accuracy Supports a wide range of programming languages Strong integration with DevOps and CI/CD pipelines

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

Early detection of vulnerabilities in source code Detailed and actionable security findings Broad language and framework support

What do you dislike most about this product?

Steep learning curve for new users Setup and configuration can be complex Scan times can be long for large codebases

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Invest time in initial setup and rule configuration Train developers to understand and act on findings Integrate into CI/CD pipelines early

Pros

  • Continually Improving Product
  • Inspires Innovation
  • Respectful
  • Acts with Integrity

Astha S.

  • Role: Consultant
  • Industry: Technology
  • Involvement: IT Development, Integration, and Administration
Validated Review
Verified Reviewer

Submitted Apr 2026

Shift-Left Security for Code Quality

Likeliness to Recommend

9 /10

What differentiates OpenText Static Application Security Testing from other similar products?

It supports multiple languages and integrates into development workflows, enabling a shift-left approach to security.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

What I like most is its ability to identify security vulnerabilities directly in the source code before deployment.

What do you dislike most about this product?

Scan times may be longer for large codebases, and interpreting results may require some security knowledge.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

Integrate it early into your CI/CD pipeline and use it consistently during development.

Pros

  • Helps Innovate
  • Performance Enhancing
  • Enables Productivity
  • Trustworthy

Most Popular OpenText Static Application Security Testing Comparisons

Visit our IT’s Moment: A Technology-First Solution for Uncertain Times Resource Center
Over 100 analysts waiting to take your call right now: +1 (703) 340 1171