Azure DevOps

What differentiates Azure DevOps from other similar products?

It's quite a unique product for implementing agile methodology in company. It eliminates waterfall method pretty much and implements agile in simple and clear manner. If someone is managing a big team of more than 100 employees who need access to projects this is product is way to go.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

It is organized. This product actually brought revolution in project management. Made it quite easy and neat to manage and complete projects.

What do you dislike most about this product?

It mainly lacks automation. Visibility and access are other features that are not much developed. They need to be worked on.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

This product needs to be integrated in your architecture if you have problem managing projects. It's a complete change in how project if managed.

What differentiates Azure DevOps from other similar products?

Planning is a great feature. Its got this planning poker interface that you can use to estimate stories and then use it during your sprint planning.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

The favorite part is the ease with which I can create stories, tasks and link them. I can see insights w.r.t Burn Down charts and average velocity metrics easily.

What do you dislike most about this product?

Nothing that I have disliked about this product.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

If you're transitioning from waterfall to Agile, consider this friend of yours who will take you a long way in the Agile journey.

What differentiates Azure DevOps from other similar products?

Significant benefits include ease of use and deployment, close integration with Azure services, and interaction with Defender threat services. The finest is network invasion; additionally, it needs much less daily maintenance because it is cloud-native. Security must be kept in the proper context. Integration is quite good. It works with Azure monitoring software. Autoscaling can be set up based on how many business transactions are made.

What is your favorite aspect of this product?

The feature of this tool we like the most is its outstanding cloud service and firewall protection for cloud data. Additionally, our organization uses Azure for cloud data management since it provides various features, including high availability and redundancy in data centers across the globe. Easy to use and deploy, tightly linked with Azure services, and interaction with Defender threat services are all major pluses.

What do you dislike most about this product?

It is less optimal and appropriate for advanced installations due to production constraints. Oracle T3 and F5 features don't support bespoke protocols, which results in design constraints. They regularly had to make decisions between alternatives for specialist firewall solutions. This has made the deployment more challenging than was previously anticipated. It took a lot of work to solve implementation issues. We also learn that the product's cost might be more competitive.

What recommendations would you give to someone considering this product?

For apps that use the public cloud, one of the better choices. Our organizational units have benefited from testing Azure and other competitors' firewalls and threat management systems. Our threat pre-emption improved significantly after implementing the Azure firewall services for our cloud-based web/CRM applications. The NAT rules enable complete inbound threat detection. The reporting tools are reasonably accurate and comprehensive.