Vendor Landscape: Virtual Backup Software
Evaluate virtual backup software to end the arguing between virtual and backup admins.
Send a friend or colleague a link to this article
RETIRED CONTENTPlease note that the content on this page is retired. This content is not maintained and may contain information or links that are out of date.
View Vendor Shortlist
What is a shortlist?
A shortlist is a personalized list of vendors based on the criteria you define. Your shortlist offers more information about vendor's strengths, weaknesses, price-points, etc, and ranks them according to your needs.
What is a Value Score?
The Value Score indexes each vendor’s product offering and business strength relative to their price point. It does not indicate vendor ranking.
Vendors that score high offer more bang for the buck (e.g. features, usability, stability, etc.) than the average vendor, while the inverse is true for those that score lower.
Price-conscious enterprises may wish to give the Value Score more consideration than those who are more focused on specific vendor/product attributes.
- With advances in server capacity (memory capacity, multi-core processing) and increases in vCPU, RAM, IOPS capacity limitations, the majority of servers can now be virtualized. In 2012, more than half of server workloads (58%) are virtualized.
- Point solutions designed for virtual backup introduced agentless backups that reduced impact of backup and recovery on production workloads. As more and more production apps get virtualized, virtual admins that had purchased point solutions and backup admins using traditional backup products are overlapping in responsibility.
- Traditional backup solutions have found ways to conduct agentless backups – with VMware largely through exposure of APIs – and virtual backup solutions have begun to add support for physical servers and application awareness for app-consistent backups. This is pushing buyers to focus on specific requirements, in terms of backup media support (e.g. tape) and characteristics that ease implementation and management of virtual infrastructure.
- Organizations are becoming more and more invested in virtualization. This makes it important to select a solution that best meets recovery needs for VMs. As organizations provision an increasing number of VMs, it is getting more challenging to effectively backup everything.
- Point solutions for VM backup are inexpensive relative to traditional solutions that handle physical and virtual backup and are simpler to use. However, most organizations are not 100% virtualized meaning that companies often manage two solutions: one for virtual and one for physical.
- Many point solutions in the backup market do not provide the capability to directly backup to tape for long-term retention. If you currently use tape, or plan to, this will require management of two solutions, which should be a consideration in the evaluation process.
Impact and Result
- Understand what kind of virtual backup solution is appropriate for core needs, and which features help to meet recovery point objectives and recovery time objectives.
- Create a shortlist of consolidated storage vendors, and select which is the best fit for your organization and budget.
- DiGiorgio Associates Incorporated
- Hamilton Health Sciences
- Learning Care Group
- Maritime Paper
- Northwest Medical Analytic Laboratory
- North Vancouver School District
- Port Waratah Coal Services
- Richardson International
- Roosevelt Management Co.
- Saunderson House
- Tedeschi Food Shops
Get the Complete Storyboard
See how all the steps you need to take come together, with tools and advice to help with each task on your list.Download Now
Get to Action
Narrow down a list of virtual backup vendors
Select the solution to meet RPOs and RTOs at the lowest possible cost.
Contrast and evaluate a shortlist of vendors
Select the right virtual backup software.
Select a Best-Fit DR Solution
Optimize Backup Operations with a Recovery Services Plan
Develop a Business Continuity Plan
Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan
Reduce Costly Downtime Through DR Testing
Implement Crisis Management Best Practices
Document and Maintain the Disaster Recovery Plan
Bridge the Gap between Service Management & Disaster Recovery
Make Disaster Recovery Actionable
Review Continuity Plans to Deal with the Threat of Ebola
Successfully Prepare for a DR Audit and Leverage the Results to Improve DR Capability