Vendor Landscape: Talent Management Solutions

Effectively manage your workforce from hire to retire with an end-to-end talent management solution.



Vendor

You are currently over the vendor limit, please adjust your weightings to equal exactly 100%.

Product

You are currently over the product limit, please adjust your weightings to equal exactly 100%.

What matters more, the vendor score or the product score? As you weigh the importance, we will generate the vendor shortlist to match your needs.

View Vendor Shortlist

What is a shortlist?

A shortlist is a personalized list of vendors based on the criteria you define. Your shortlist offers more information about vendor's strengths, weaknesses, price-points, etc, and ranks them according to your needs.


Access this Vendor Shortlist by logging in with your Info-Tech Research Group membership or unlocking this content.

Champion

What is a Value Score?

The Value Score indexes each vendor’s product offering and business strength relative to their price point. It does not indicate vendor ranking.

Vendors that score high offer more bang for the buck (e.g. features, usability, stability, etc.) than the average vendor, while the inverse is true for those that score lower.

Price-conscious enterprises may wish to give the Value Score more consideration than those who are more focused on specific vendor/product attributes.


Your Challenge

  • Over the last number of years, the Talent Management (TM) market has experienced widespread consolidation; larger talent management vendors have bought up niche players and large ERP vendors have begun purchasing talent management solutions.
  • As a result, talent management competition in the mid-market is now dominated by large, established multi-nationals with a broad user base and extensive resources.
  • Some vendors offer fully homegrown solutions, but the vast majority are a result of acquisitions. For vendors in the latter group, their legacy product tends to be their strongest, though this is changing; these vendors are focused on creating solutions that are uniform in look and feel.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Organizations should carefully consider their short-term social and mobile requirements before focusing too heavily on social and mobile functionalities; vendor offerings will improve across the board over the next few years.
  • Advanced reporting and analytics functionality that allows the integration of data points from separate modules has become a point of differentiation for some vendors.
  • Vendors that have a solution which contains disparate pieces obtained through acquisition will work toward even more robust back-end integration between modules to ensure the user experience is seamless.

Impact and Result

  • Look for first-class module integration in a TM solution. Seamless integration of all talent management modules creates a top quality user experience from end to end.
  • Look to vendors with recruitment, performance management, learning, and compensation functionality for full employee lifecycle management.

Get the Complete Storyboard

See how all the steps you need to take come together, with tools and advice to help with each task on your list.

Download Now

Get to Action

  1. Evaluate TM solutions

    Determine which talent management solution best meets enterprise needs.

  2. Compare TM solutions based on specific criteria

    Develop a custom shortlist of TM solutions.

Guided Implementation Icon Talk to an Analyst

Our analyst calls are focused on helping our members use the research we produce, and our experts will guide you to successful project completion.

  • Book an Analyst Call on this topic. You can start as early as tomorrow morning. Our analysts will explain the process in your first call.
  • Get advice from a subject matter expert. Each call will focus on explaining the material and helping you to plan your project, interpret and analyze the results of each project step, and setting the direction for your next project step.

Schedule Your First Call


GET HELP Contact Us
×
VL Methodology